Friday, December 31, 2010

City Guy In The 'Burbs

Episode Six

The Blizzard of 2010 slammed the northeast on the day after Christmas sending everyone into a frenzy.  In the aftermath I was again reminded of the stark difference between snow in the city and snow in the ‘burbs. 

In the city snow is generally a hassle.  Just ask beleagured New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who actually might have a much stronger word for it right now.  On the contrary, in the ‘burbs snow is an ethereal experience.  As a veteran of both environments I know this firsthand.

Snow falling in the city is beautiful.  It’s serene and romantic.  Of course, this dramatically changes as soon as vehicle exhaust turns all that beauty into a blackened, repulsive mass.  Then you just wish the snow would simply go away.  In most cases, this transformation happens within twelve hours, tops.  And by then traffic is snarled and parking a nightmare.  Worse, trying to cross the street can be as daunting as any extreme outdoor adventure.  With sewers clogged and overwhelmed, the corners become wide expanses of bottomless puddles and slush.  If you don’t have waterproof boots, fuggedaboutit.  You might as well go back to your apartment and wait until April.

In the ‘burbs snow has an entirely different effect.  School is cancelled.  No one goes to work.  Out come sleds and saucers.  Hot chocolate is set brewing in every house.  The women begin baking, while the men swarm the landscape with snow blowers, shovels, and ice picks, reclaiming driveways and brick front walks.  It’s like a festival.  The only thing missing is loudspeakers  blaring Edelweiss.    

I bought my first shovel when I moved to the ‘burbs.  Before then I didn’t need one.  The super always cleaned the steps and our car was safely stowed in a local garage.  Now when it snows I tell work I’m not coming in because I have to dig myself out, but secretly I’m hoping that, like when I was in grade school in the Bronx, some guys will ring my bell and ask me to help build fort in the playground so we can have a good ol’ fashioned snowball fight.        

Thursday, December 30, 2010

The Sporadic Diary

December 28, 2010

I was at a holiday party the other night populated mostly with acquaintances but no close friends.  People repeatedly gathered in small groupings and, after a few perfunctory hellos and howya doins, there generally followed awkward silence.  Until invariably someone brought up the weather.  Sure has gotten cold someone said.  Do you think we’ll have a lot of snow this winter? asked another.  Wasn’t that ice storm unbelievable? offered a third. 

This experience confirmed for me that the weather is far and way the king of conversation filler.  Nothing else even comes close.  I don’t have empirical data to support this claim, but, well, unfounded assertions happen a lot in informal blog posts like this.  However, on this one I feel very confident. 

Of course, it is easy to see why the weather is the premier stopgap topic when the conversation well runs dry; it is because, unlike subjects like sports or home repair, the weather knows no cultural or gender boundaries.  It is the universal element in everyone’s lives.  We all can relate to it, are affected by it, and must react to it.

But my guess is it wasn’t always this way.  Think of early man.  He’s in a cave planning the approaching day.  I don’t think he worried too much if it was going to be clear or partly cloudy, humid or raining.  If he was hungry and needed to slay a mastodon, he threw on his loin cloth and got on with it.  And I can’t picture him standing around the fire chatting up the neighbors about the cold front that was threatening or the possibility of late afternoon thunderstorms.  Now the biblical flood, that was another matter.

Back in the present, we afford so much time and effort to understanding the weather, it’s mindboggling.  By demand, newspapers, websites, and tv provide enough weather data, charts, and time lapse satellite images to keep our heads spinning.  It’s also no secret that weathermen are legitimate, five-star celebrities. 

So when did we become obsessed with the weather?  I’m not sure, but I’d say it was sometime after the biblical flood and before the advent of broadcast news.          

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Monkey Business


Open Letter to the Human Species:

Let me start by saying this: much has been made of the fact that humans have an opposable thumb and monkeys don’t, as if that alone should determine the relative merits of the two species.  But I contend there is much that we monkeys, by which broadly speaking I include apes and guerillas, can do that far outpaces humans in many areas of endeavor.

For one, monkeys have strong, brachiated arms that allow us to climb trees and swing effortlessly and joyously from one to another.  You humans have made such a big deal of the Flying Wallendas in their comical tights, but, think about it, every monkey can do what they have done only better.

Monkeys are also fine entertainers.  We can make humans laugh very easily, just by curling our lips into a goofy face or by sticking, say, a Savinelli pipe in our mouths and pretending to smoke.  When was the last time a human made a monkey laugh?  And it’s a fact that each year we make some of the funniest Super Bowl commercials.  We are very accomplished mimics too, hence the term “aper,” which is a frequent answer in the prestigious New York Times crossword puzzle.

Monkeys have also made their marks in the movies and television.  For instance, monkeys stole the show in Bedtime For Bonzo and Every Which Way But Loose.  Reagan and Eastwood were the real extras in those flicks, mere eye candy for the female audience.  Furthermore, we could have easily handled the relevant parts in Planet Of The Apes, but unfortunately some lamebrain producer or director decided the monkey roles would be played by humans dressed in monkey outfits.  They looked ludicrous, like they were wearing cheap Halloween costumes.  Moreover, to top it off they didn’t even bother to hire a monkey coach. 

And then there is the case of Tarzan.  In that popular series, Johnny Weissmuller, who granted was a fine swimmer, plays the lead role and is always getting in trouble.  It is up to the animals in the jungle, generally led by monkeys, to pull his behind out of the fire.  He calls his adopted son Boy.  Okay.  But then he calls his monkey friend Cheeta.  How dumb is that?  What does he call actual cheetahs?  We called him Lunkhead.

In the late 1960s your people created and promoted The Monkees [sic] as a pop rock band, trying I suppose to leverage general monkey popularity.  But they were amateur musicians at best and, although they had several “hits,” weren’t good enough to play even weddings in our world.  The Beatles were a much better group and, in a nod to our musical talents, incorporated our familiar ooh ooh ooh eeeh eeh eeh aah aah aah lyrics into some of their songs (e.g., I Am The Walrus).  

In the world of science, monkeys make excellent subjects.  We’ve collaborated with researchers at your finest hospitals and institutions, making important advances in medicine, psychology, sociology, and other fields.  We were the first to appreciate the work of Dian Fossey and Jane Goodall, two perspicacious scientists whose seminal studies showed the world how truly advanced we are.  Under their watchful eyes, we demonstrated our ability to use tools to find food and do other daily tasks.  Initially, instead of awarding them honors, you vilified them.  How juvenile and shortsighted.    

And, of course, we were pioneers in space travel.  Albert, a Rhesus, was the first monkey astronaut and Albert II was the first monkey in space, crossing the Karman outer space line of 100 kilometers twelve years ahead of Soviet Yuri Gagarin.  Many brave monkey astronauts were killed in those heady days, just as many monkeys have been harmed egregiously and without warrant in assorted scientific experiments.  Have we complained?  No.  Though we could have sued you guys to kingdom come, and you know it.

Meanwhile, statisticians continue to ruminate about something they call the infinite monkey theorem, which deals with reasoning about infinity.  This theorem says that a monkey banging on a typewriter long enough will almost surely through random chance eventually turn out the entire works of William Shakespeare.  Apparently a variation of this nonsense dates to the time of Aristotle.  Come on.  We monkeys have better things to do with our time than to pound randomly on typewriters or spend thousands of years pondering the mysteries of exceedingly vast numbers.  Which is the sillier species here?   

Now while monkeys can be aggressive, we lash out only when the situation calls for it and confine our actions to the offending party.  We were not the ones who invented and used nuclear weapons on their own kind.  We have not polluted the environment by burning fossil fuels or by irresponsibly discarding mountains of non-biodegradable waste.  We are careful about our nutrition and exercise regularly.  We are not a profligate or duplicitous species.  And, what’s more, our babies are a lot cuter than yours.

Finally, I draw your attention to John Scopes, the high school biology instructor in that famous evolution case in Tennessee so many years ago, an event which we followed with great interest.  Mr. Scopes knew the score and was willing to defy the local school board that, with all due respect, had its head up its you-know-what.  We thought the Scopes Trial put an end to the controversy, but as your recent political squabbles attest it still burns fiercely in some ignorant and closed-minded humans.  But there’s no denying it, gene for gene we and you are virtually the same.  As we monkeys like to say, doesn’t that just put the chocolate on the banana. 

So, you humans can talk all you want about the opposable thumb.  Just remember that if it weren’t for monkeys you wouldn’t be able to do most of the things you take for granted.  We paved the way and discovered through trial and error how to not only survive, but thrive in an often inhospitable world. 

Sincerely,
Mr. Chicklet
Executive Director
The Institute of Simian Achievement

Thursday, December 9, 2010

City Guy In The 'Burbs

Episode Five

If you asked me what is one of the biggest advantages of living in the suburbs, probably the first thing I’d say it’s that you can do your laundry much easier.  Then, after additional consideration I’d go further and say it’s without question THE BIGGEST advantage. 

Before I lived in the suburbs doing the laundry was equivalent to one of the labors of Hercules.  You know: Slay the Nemean lion, Capture the Golden Hind of Artemis, Clean the Augean stables, Wash and Dry clothes.

When I was growing up in the city, our family was one of the lucky ones: we had a washing machine in our apartment.  (This was against policy.)  The machine was in our kitchen, wedged between the sink and the food cabinets.  This made washing our clothes easy.  But since we did not have a dryer, we had to hang our wet laundry on a metal dryer contraption, which we opened up in my parents’ bedroom.  Not only was this incredibly inconvenient for my parents, but once a week it also raised the humidity level in there to that of an athletic club steam room.

Of course, the other option was to take the laundry to a laundromat.  This was my solution when I moved out of my parents’ apartment in the mid 1970s.  I was living in the Back Bay section of Boston and every week for several years I took my dirty clothes to the laundromat.  My regular spot was The Laundromat of the Stars on Newbury Street.  It was called that because apparently several actors and actresses had done their laundry there and the machines they used were marked with plaques.  I routinely used the Gloria Swanson machine.

To do your laundry at a laundromat there are several necessities.  One, you need one of those collapsible wheeled carts to transport your laundry bag.  Two, you need to bring your own detergent since to buy it at the Laundromat will cost you an arm and a leg.  And, three, you have to have plenty of quarters.  This last point cannot be emphasized enough because the machines break down periodically and you never know when you’ll get a dryer that puts out almost negligible levels of heat, forcing you to feed quarters into the slot like a drunken Las Vegas gambler.

There aren’t many positive aspects of having to go to the laundromat.  Okay, sometimes you might meet someone interesting.  But that never happened to me.  Perhaps the most positive aspect is that you can watch people’s clothes tumble through the windows of the dryers.  For city dwellers, this can be mesmerizing, sort of like watching flames dancing in a campfire only without the sweet wood-burning smell and sound of crickets.  I’d often follow one item, like someone’s red underwear, rise, twist, and fall over and over and over.  Ah, but I reminisce.     

In the suburbs doing the laundry is much more mundane.  No crazy characters talking loudly.  No Vesuvian eruptions when some rookie puts too much detergent into the machine.  No fights over dryers.  No need to stockpile quarters.  And, of course, there is the convenience.  So, in a vote, suburban laundering gets the nod.  Definitely.